Rereading and interpreting the ideas of leading Muslim thinkers
mohammad mahdi Hosseinmardi; Latifeh Hosseini; Zainab esmati
Abstract
Western theorists view the principle of self-determination as a reading of liberal-democracy systems and presuppositions of individual rights and freedoms. The Naini and Ja’fari have divergent perspectives. Such a mechanism is confronted by the paradox both fundamentally and in the case of political ...
Read More
Western theorists view the principle of self-determination as a reading of liberal-democracy systems and presuppositions of individual rights and freedoms. The Naini and Ja’fari have divergent perspectives. Such a mechanism is confronted by the paradox both fundamentally and in the case of political theories in the west. This study’s primary objective is to investigate the right to self-determination in light of the fundamental rights derived from a common theoretical core shared by two thinkers in shite. This research is qualitative and descriptive-analytical, and the library method was chosen due to the subject matter and the character of the documents. According to the findings of the study, the principle of theochratic sovereignty has been the foundation of the value-based democracy, and Ja’fari considers it to be essential to a reasonable human existence. However, the decisive chapter is actually Naini’s belief in the right to choose and the opportunity to affirm the legitimacy of sovereignty by the public or the people.
